Essay on why the south seceded

Posted on November 13, by Scott Alexander I. Medieval Icelandic crime victims would sell the right to pursue a perpetrator to the highest bidder. Somali judges compete on the free market; those who give bad verdicts get a reputation that drives away future customers.

Essay on why the south seceded

So much for states rights.

Related Stories

They were just mildly unfair, not something to kill hundreds of thousands of people over. Moreover, the Southern aristocrats themselves adopted the same, everybody-pays-but-a-few-benefit-system in their own tariff system used to fund the maintenance of ports for exporting cotton.

They taxed ships on the value of their cargos a tariff instead the cost of getting the ship in an out of port harbor fees. In the harbor fee system, two identical ships, one carrying gold, the other gravel pay the same price. In a tariff system the gold ship pays way more even though the value of its cargo is utterly unconnected to cost of maintaining the harbor.

This meant at the very least that southerners who did not export nevertheless helped subsidized those who did. As the war progressed, the aristocrats revealed hypocrisy after hypocrisy as they shifted the cost both in money and blood to the few yeoman farmers and poor whites.

Really, as class just a bunch of entitled self-centered sack weasels in the main.

Essay on why the south seceded

But clearly the Confederates themselves thought slavery the root cause of the conflict… … but while most Northerners opposed slavery they did so not primarily based on its cruelty of because it violated the premise that all men were created equal.

For the previous 20 years or so everyone from theologians to cutting edge scientist had been squirming to find a rational to define non-whites as something akin to what we would call sub-species i.

Essay on why the south seceded

Firstly, to put it starkly, the South looked less and less like America and more and more like Europe, central to eastern Europe at that.

That is why virtually every government in Europe, all aristocratic since the Napoleonic era, sided with the Confederacy. After when Andrew Jackson required all government payments to be in species, he triggered a depression and a deflation that destroyed the already tenuous Southern middle-class.

Most southern states had only granted universal white male suffrage in the s an most of the upper classes wanted to role that back. Northerners had no wish to live in a nation dominated by an aristocracy and since the aristocracy rested on slavery, slavery had to go.

Secondly, working class whites feared having to compete with slave labor. The leasing out of highly skilled slaves e. Of course there were abolitionist but they were mostly a bunch of self-rightous jerks, more concerned about satisfying their glutenous self-rightouness than freeing fellow human beings from bondage.

Their role in the run up to and the war itself was large negative. But all those factors paled beside the cause of Union. The vast majority of Union soldiers fought and died because they believed it was an absolute requirement to survival of American democracy that a precedent of secession never be established.

Even a lot of Confederates worried about it. Any polity based on the right of secession would start falling apart at the first strain.

It seems strange to us today because we take Union for granted, but from the Revolutionary War onward, secession was a constant threat that occupied a lot of attention.

South Carolina was ready to bolt in the Revolutionary war if the British would let them keep their slaves. That was what was at stake.

At that point, the United States was the only Democracy left in the world. If it failed, democracy in Europe probably would have failed as well. And without Democracy, the end of slavery or hundred other universal human ills would never end. Part of the support that put him over came from southern Republicans.

No, what triggered secession was that Lincoln swept the electoral college, winning votes out of with his closet opponent winning only Worse he did so without any electoral votes from any Southern slave state.

The electoral college was configured in large part to ensure the candidates it elected had the broadest regional support. The slavecrats saw the the writing was on the wall.

With a near static electoral population, faced with a rapidly growing electoral population in the North and West, they would become an electoral irrelevance henceforward. Future presidential candidates could simply ignore the South and still expect to win.

A better question would be to ask why South Carolina the least democratic American state who had attempted to secede twice before, seceded in December of when Lincoln would not be inaugurated in March.

Indeed, a deep desperation seems to have existed in secessionist to get as many states out of the union before Lincoln assumed office. Some states where arguably simply hijacked. The only plausible explanation is that they needed to push through secession while Lincoln was still a cypher in the South and while the aristocrats could still control the narrative about him.

Before he assumed office, they could trick people into taking action about what Lincoln might do, whereas once he was in office people would judge him by what he did.

Their worse fear was that Lincoln would enter office and do exactly what he ran on, not interfere with slavery etc.Words Only Southerners Say - a collection of slang, colloquialisms, and Sh*t Southern Women Say - a roundup from thousands of folks across the South + U.S.

See main articles Origins of the American Civil War, Confederate States of America and American Civil War..

The most famous secession movement was the case of the Southern states of the United States. Secession from the United States was accepted in eleven states (and failed in two others). The southern states which seceded were; South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and North Carolina who attempted to form a southern Confederacy on equal terms to the Union in the north.

Secession and Racism — Northern Style.

The free online encyclopedia of Washington state history

Did Abraham Lincoln always hold that secession was treason? Here is something he said on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, in , when he was a member of Congress: “Any people, anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better.

The free online encyclopedia of Washington state history. articles now available. Other seceding states echoed South Carolina. “Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery — the greatest material interest of the world,” proclaimed Mississippi in.

Book Review: Legal Systems Very Different From Ours | Slate Star Codex